Lymphedema: an unusual complication of sirolimus therapy

Lymphedema: an unusual complication of sirolimus therapy
May 2007

Al-Otaibi T, Ahamed N, Nampoory MR, Al-Kandari N, Nair P, Hallm MA, Said T, Samhan M, Al-Mousawi M.
Hamed Al-Essa Organ Transplant Centre, Kuwait.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphedema is an increasingly observed complication of sirolimus (SIR) therapy. In this report, we describe four renal recipients with SIR-induced lymphedema of varying severity.

CASES REPORTS: Patient 1, a 38-year-old man developed lymphedema of the left upper limb after being exposed to SIR for 30 months (mean daily Rapamune dose, 3 mg; trough level, 10-18 ng/mL). Venography and duplex ultrasound were normal. Lymphangiography was showed delayed lymphatic drainage. SIR was replaced with Prograf with significant improvement in the lymphedema over the next 6 months. Patient 2, a 26-year-old woman, developed lymphedema of the left lower limb at 24 months after starting SIR (mean daily dose, 3 mg; trough level, 10-15 ng/mL). Lymphangiography showed delayed drainage of lymphatics in the left lower limb. The patient was shifted to Prograf and there was some improvement over the next 4 months. Patient 3, a 28-year-old man, developed lymphedema of the left upper limb at 24 months after the start of SIR (mean daily dose, 2 mg, trough level, 6-15 ng/mL). Lymphangiography showed evidence of lymphatic obstruction. SIR was changed to cyclosporine with only mild improvement in lymphedema over the next 6 months. Patient 4, a 46-year-old man, developed lymphedema of the right upper limb at 7 months after starting SIR (mean daily dose, 6 mg; trough level, 10-16 ng/mL). Lymphangiography showed complete blockage of the lymphatic channels. SIR was changed to cyclosporine and there was mild improvement in lymphedema over the next 8 to 10 months.

CONCLUSION: The exact mechanism of SIR-induced lymphedema is unknown. The absence of other demonstrable etiologies and spontaneous improvement after discontinuation of SIR suggest that this drug was the responsible factor in these four patients. It occurred 7 to 30 months after transplantation. This is the fourth such report in the literature to the best of our knowledge.

ELSEVIER

Lymphedema associated with sirolimus in renal transplant recipients.

Severe limb lymphedema in sirolimus-treated patients.

Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar

Romagnoli J, Citterio F, Nanni G, Tondolo V, Castagneto M. Department of Surgery, Organ Transplantation, Policlinico Gemelli, Rome, Italy.

We report two kidney transplant recipients who developed severe limb lymphedema under sirolimus (SRL) immunosuppression. The patients received SRL 10 and 2 mg/d to achieve target levels of 10 to 20 ng/mL with tapering doses of prednisone. Renal function and drug levels were monitored monthly. Patient 1 developed lymphedema of the left upper limb 3 years posttransplantation, after having been exposed to high SRL doses in the preceding 2 years (mean SRL dose-9.5 mg/d, mean trough level-26.3 ng/mL, mean serum creatinine-1.63 mg/dL). In patient 2 lymphedema of both upper and lower right limbs occurred 18 months posttransplantation (mean SRL dose-3.2 mg/d, mean trough level-8.8 ng/ mL, mean serum creatinine-2.9 mg/dL).

Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were also observed in both patients before SRL reduction/conversion. No signs of hematopoietic toxicity were observed. In both patients magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the limb was negative for vascular obstruction, and lymphoscintigraphy revealed lymphatic obstruction. In patient 1 lymphedema improved significantly following SRL reduction and lymphatic drainage massage therapy. Patient 2 was converted to cyclosporine (CsA) improving markedly after conversion. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia also improved significantly in both patients after reduction/conversion.

We conclude that SRL may facilitate the occurrence of lymphatic obstruction by mechanisms that are presently unexplained. Lymphedema of the limbs in renal transplant recipients under SRL treatment, especially if on the same side as the hemodialysis access, should warn the transplant physician to rapidly reduce or withdraw SRL before the occurrence of complete obstruction.

Transplantation Proceedings